Impact of insurance status on healthcare resource utilization and outcomes in adolescent patients presenting with spinal cord injuries.

OBJECTIVE: Insurance disparities have been suggested to influence the medical and surgical outcomes of adult patients with spinal cord injury (SCI), with a paucity of studies demonstrating their impact on the outcomes of pediatric and adolescent SCI patients. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of insurance status on healthcare utilization and outcomes in adolescent patients presenting with SCI. METHODS: An administrative database study was performed using the 2017 admission year from 753 facilities using the National Trauma Data Bank. Adolescent patients (11-17 years old) with cervical/thoracic SCIs were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification coding. Patients were categorized by governmental insurance versus private insurance/self-pay. Patient demographics, comorbidities, imaging, procedures, hospital adverse events (AEs), and length of stay (LOS) data were collected. Multivariate regression analyses were used to determine the effect of insurance status on LOS, any imaging or procedure, or any AE. RESULTS: Of the 488 patients identified, 220 (45.1%) held governmental insurance while 268 (54.9%) were privately insured. Age was similar between the cohorts (p = 0.616), with the governmental insurance cohort (GI cohort) having a significantly lower proportion of non-Hispanic White patients than the private insurance cohort (PI cohort) (GI: 43.2% vs PI: 72.4%, p < 0.001). While transportation accident was the most common mechanism of injury for both cohorts, assault was significantly greater in the GI cohort (GI: 21.8% vs PI: 3.0%, p < 0.001). A significantly greater proportion of patients in the PI cohort received any imaging (GI: 65.9% vs PI: 75.0%, p = 0.028), while there were no significant differences in procedures performed (p = 0.069) or hospital AEs (p = 0.386) between the cohorts. The median (IQR) LOS (p = 0.186) and discharge disposition (p = 0.302) were similar between the cohorts. On multivariate analysis, with respect to governmental insurance, private insurance was not independently associated with obtaining any imaging (OR 1.38, p = 0.139), undergoing any procedure (OR 1.09, p = 0.721), hospital AEs (OR 1.11, p = 0.709), or LOS (adjusted risk ratio -2.56, p = 0.203). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that insurance status may not independently influence healthcare resource utilization and outcomes in adolescent patients presenting with SCIs. Further studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

Effects of delayed ambulation following posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a single institutional study.

OBJECTIVE: Mobilizing out of bed and ambulation are key components of recovery following posterior spinal fusion (PSF) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, there remains a paucity of studies identifying risk factors associated with delayed ambulation and its impact on postoperative outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate patient- and surgical-level risk factors associated with delayed ambulation and the ramifications of delayed ambulation on healthcare utilization for patients undergoing PSF for AIS. METHODS: The medical records of 129 adolescent (10-18 years) patients diagnosed with AIS undergoing posterior spinal fusion at a major academic institution between 2013 and 2020 were reviewed. Patients were categorized based on days from surgery to ambulation: early (≤ 1 day), intermediate (2 days), or late (≥ 3 days). Patient demographics, comorbidities, spinal deformity characteristics, intraoperative variables, postoperative complications, LOS, and unplanned readmissions were assessed. The odds ratios for risk-adjusted delayed ambulation and extended LOS were determined via multivariate stepwise logistic regressions. RESULTS: One Hundred and Twenty Nine patients were included in this study, of which 10.8% (n = 14) were classified as Early ambulators, 41.9% (n = 54) Intermediate ambulators, and 47.3% (n = 61) were Late ambulators. Late ambulators were significantly younger than early and intermediate ambulators (Early: 15.7 ± 1.9 years vs. Intermediate: 14.8 ± 1.7 years vs. Late: 14.1 ± 1.9 years, p = 0.010). The primary and secondary spinal curves were significantly worse among Late ambulators (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002 respectively). Fusion levels (p < 0.01), EBL (p = 0.014), and the rate of RBC transfusions (p < 0.001) increased as time to ambulation increased. Transition time from IV to oral pain medications (Early: 1.6 ± 0.8 days vs. Intermediate: 2.2 ± 0.6 days vs. Late: 2.4 ± 0.6 days, p < 0.001) and total hospital length of stay (Early: 3.9 ± 1.4 days vs. Intermediate: 4.7 ± 0.9 days vs. Late: 5.1 ± 1.2 days, p < 0.001) were longer in Late ambulators. On multivariate analysis, significant predictors of delayed ambulation included primary curve degree ≥ 70° [aOR: 5.67 (1.29‒31.97), p = 0.030] and procedure time [aOR: 1.66 (1.1‒2.59), p = 0.019]. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that there may be patient- and surgical-level factors that are independently associated with late ambulation following PSF for AIS, including extent of major curve and length of operative time. Additionally, delayed ambulation has implications to length of hospital stay and postoperative complications.

Financial Implications of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical advancements in breast reconstruction have allowed a shift toward optimizing patient-reported outcomes and efficiency measures. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol has been instrumental in improving outcomes, but the effect of these protocols on health care spending has not been examined. This study aims to assess the effect of ERAS protocols on the length of hospital stay and costs associated with microsurgical breast reconstruction. METHODS: In 2018, the authors implemented an ERAS protocol for patients undergoing microsurgical breast reconstruction that included perioperative procedures involving patient education and care. Subjects included patients who underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction at the authors' institution between 2016 and 2019. Data were gathered from the electronic medical record and the hospital system's finance department, and patients were divided into pre-ERAS and ERAS cohorts. A 2-sample t test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The study included 269 patients with no statistically significant differences in demographic data between the cohorts. The average length of hospitalization was 3.46 days for the pre-ERAS group and 2.45 days for the ERAS group ( P = 0.000). In a linear regression, the ERAS protocol predicted a 1.04-day decrease in the length of stay ( P = 0.000). Overall, total direct cost decreased by 7.5% with the ERAS protocol. CONCLUSION: The rising cost of health care presents a challenge for providers to reduce the cost burden placed on our health system while providing the highest-quality care. This study demonstrates that the use of standardized ERAS protocols can achieve this 2-fold goal.

Streamlining and Consistency in Surgery: Lean Six Sigma to Improve Operating Room Efficiency.

BACKGROUND: Improving perioperative efficiency helps reduce unnecessary surgical expenditure, increase operating room throughput, improve patient safety, and enhance staff and patient satisfaction. Lean Six Sigma (LSS) is a quality improvement model that has been successfully applied to eliminate inefficiencies in the business sector but has not yet been widely adopted in medicine. This study investigates the adaptation of LSS to improve operative efficiency for plastic surgery procedures. METHODS: The authors followed the define, measure, analyze, improve, and control phases to implement LSS. The key outcome measures gathered were operative times, including the cut-to-close time, and the total time the patient spent in the operating room. RESULTS: The study included a total of 181 patients who underwent immediate bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction between January of 2016 and December of 2019. The LSS interventions were associated with a decrease in total operative time from 636.36 minutes to 530.35 minutes, and a decrease in the time between incision to closure from 555.16 minutes to 458.85 minutes for a bilateral mastectomy with immediate deep inferior epigastric artery flap breast reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that LSS is useful to improve perioperative efficiency during complex plastic surgery procedures. The workflow of the procedure was improved by determining the optimal spatial positioning and distinct roles for each surgeon and preparing surgeon-specific surgical trays. Two process maps were developed to visualize the positioning of the surgeons during each stage of the procedure and depict the parallel workflow that helped improve intraoperative efficiency.

The estrous cycle modulates early-life adversity effects on mouse avoidance behavior through progesterone signaling.

Early-life adversity (ELA) increases the likelihood of neuropsychiatric diagnoses, which are more prevalent in women than men. Since changes in reproductive hormone levels can also increase the probability of anxiety disorders in women, we examined the effects of ELA on adult female mice across the estrous cycle. We found that during diestrus, when progesterone levels are relatively high, ELA mice exhibit increased avoidance behavior and increased theta oscillation power in the ventral hippocampus (vHIP). We also found that diestrus ELA mice had higher levels of progesterone and lower levels of allopregnanolone, a neurosteroid metabolite of progesterone, in the vHIP compared with control-reared mice. Progesterone receptor antagonism normalized avoidance behavior in ELA mice, while treatment with a negative allosteric modulator of allopregnanolone promoted avoidance behavior in control mice. These results suggest that altered vHIP progesterone and allopregnanolone signaling during diestrus increases avoidance behavior in ELA mice.

Cross-Sectional Analysis of Instagram Use in American Plastic Surgery Practices.

BACKGROUND: The growth of social media has transformed advertising within plastic surgery. Recent studies have characterized these developments, but objective analysis is needed. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analysis of online media use by American Society of Plastic Surgeons members who received board certification in 2000, 2005, 2010, 2015, or 2019. Online searches and StatShow revealed social media and website metrics. Metropolitan-based practices were determined using Department of Agriculture continuum codes. Descriptive and quantitative analyses were used to make inferences regarding study aims. RESULTS: This study included 811 surgeons. A total of 58.6 percent had practice websites and 43.9 percent had professional Instagram accounts. Instagram use was widespread across subspecialties and there was no significant difference in the number of followers by subspecialty ( p = 0.34). Year of certification had no significant effect on the number of followers ( p = 0.12); however, recently certified and seasoned members had the fewest. The top 1 percent of surgeons had more followers than the remaining 99 percent combined. Those with metropolitan-based practices had significantly higher website traffic ( p = 0.01) but no difference in the number of followers ( p = 0.88). There was no evidence that the number of followers or posts per month correlated with website traffic ( R 2 = 0.004 and 0.036, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates findings from a cross-sectional analysis of plastic surgeons from different training backgrounds, regions, and tenure. The use of Instagram in professional practice is widespread but there is no correlation between its use and increased website traffic.

Conflict of Interest at Microsurgery Conferences: Disclosure of Its Extent and Nature.

BACKGROUND: Industry relationships and conflicts of interest can impact research funding, topics, and outcomes. Little research regarding the role of biomedical companies at microsurgery conferences is available. This study evaluates the role of industry at conferences by comparing payments received by speakers at the American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgeons (ASRM) meeting with those received by speakers at the American Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS) meeting, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) meeting, and an average plastic surgeon. It also compares payments made by different companies. METHODS: General payments received by speakers at the 2017 ASAPS, ASPS, and ASRM conferences were collected from the Open Payments Database. Mean payments received at each conference were calculated and the Mann-Whitney U test evaluated differences between conference speakers and the average plastic surgeon. The total amount of payments from each company was collected through the Open Payments Database, and Z-tests identified which companies paid significantly more than others. RESULTS: The mean (and median) general payments made to conference speakers at ASAPS (n = 75), ASPS (n = 247), and ASRM (n = 121) were $75,577 ($861), $27,562 ($1,021), and $16,725 ($652), respectively. These payments were significantly greater (p < 0.001 for all) than those of the average plastic surgeon ($4,441 and $327), but not significantly different from each other. Allergan contributed significantly more than other companies to speakers at ASPS and ASAPS, while LifeCell Corporation, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, and Axogen contributed significantly more to speakers at ASRM. CONCLUSION: Payments to physicians at ASRM were significantly higher than those of an average plastic surgeon but not significantly different from those of speakers at ASAPS and ASPS. Certain companies paid significantly more than their peers at each conference. Given these findings, speakers should strive to make clear the nature and extent of their conflicts of interest when presenting at conferences.

Preoperative Evaluation of the Rhinoplasty Patient.

Requiring both high-level technical skills and artistic sense, rhinoplasty continues to be one of the most challenging procedures in plastic surgery despite its popularity. A thorough preoperative consultation of the rhinoplasty patient forms the foundation of a successful case. During the consultation, the physician should obtain a detailed medical and nasal history, understand the patient's areas of concern, conduct a nasal analysis, and evaluate the patient's candidacy for surgery. This article reviews the key functional, esthetic, and psychosocial considerations that should be taken into account during a preoperative consultation for a rhinoplasty patient.

Complications of operative vaginal delivery and provider volume and experience.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate associations between operative vaginal delivery complications and provider experience (operative vaginal delivery volume and time since residency). METHODS: We included all operative vaginal deliveries between 2008 and 2014 at a tertiary care teaching hospital, stratified into forceps-assisted and vacuum-assisted deliveries. Complications included severe perineal lacerations (3rd and 4th degree) and neonatal injuries (subgaleal/subdural/cerebral hemorrhage, facial nerve injury, and scalp injury), which were identified by International Classification Diagnosis-9 codes. Providers were categorized by operative vaginal delivery volume (mean annual forceps- or vacuum-assisted deliveries over the study interval) and time since residency. Regression analyses were used to compare complication rates by provider volume and time since residency, adjusting for potential confounders, using 0-1 deliveries per year and <5 years since residency as reference groups. RESULTS: Nine hundred and thirty-four forceps and 1074 vacuums occurred. For forceps-assisted deliveries, severe perineal injury was decreased among providers with >10 forceps per year (aOR 0.50 [95%CI 0.30-0.81]) and at 15-19 years (aOR 0.45 [95% CI 0.22-0.94], and ≥25 years (aOR 0.45 [0.27-0.73]) since residency. There were no associations with neonatal injuries. Among vacuum-assisted deliveries, severe perineal injury decreased at ≥25 years since residency (aOR 0.35 [95%CI 0.17-0.74], with no association with provider volume. Neonatal injury decreased at 5-9 years (aOR 0.53 [95%CI 0.30-0.93]), and 15-19 years since residency (aOR 0.53 [95%CI 0.29-0.97]), due to differences in scalp injuries. Neonatal injuries other than scalp injury were rare. CONCLUSION: Severe perineal lacerations decreased with increasing operative vaginal delivery experience, primarily among forceps-assisted vaginal delivery. Providers >5 years since residency may have lower scalp injury with vacuums, but this cohort was largely underpowered for neonatal injury.